Who know what the patents are about?
This issue is also about other clinical trials.
I do understand that some papers are not about clinical trials.
The fact is that the molecule does not work in people.
You might expect a reassessment from front door to back door.
“Just because it didn’t work in people does not mean that the molecule’s premise is not valid.” could be turned on its head. Just becasue it didn’t work in people does not mean that the molecule’s premise is valid”.
What about some house-cleaning, not distance-running?
